I am sorry for my lack of writing, but I have a job now. Yes my friends I have a job, I get paid for it and everything. Granted I am sticking labels on boxes, which isn’t the most arduous task in the world, but at least I am earning money. In case you were wondering about the title of this piece, isn’t about Robert Palmer’s 1979 hit ‘Bad Case of Loving You’ (this gives you an insight into my musical taste), rather, it’s about Doctor Who.
I don’t think there is any doubt in my mind, or in fact in the mind of anybody who knows me, that I am a Doctor Who fan, I do have DVDs. I am an unashamed fan of Doctor Who and always have been. In fact there have been entire days at University dedicated to watching the Sci-Fi hit. As a result I think I have earned the right to comment on the show. And as we build up to the new series I can’t think of a better time to get things off my chest. Are you ready? Are you sure? Here we go.
First things first, I want to start with the previous 3 seasons which saw Matt Smith taking the lead role as the Time Lord from Gallifrey in the constellation of Kasterborous. The team behind the 11thincarnation of the Time Lord had an almost impossible task following the departure of many people’s favourite Doctor (I want to add here that he isn’t my favourite) David Tennant. And also the loss of Russell T. Davis. The previous head writer and master mind in bringing Doctor Who back to life.
In my opinion, the team behind seasons 5 to 7 of (read in a sarcastic voice, I will be coming back to this) ‘New Who’ almost failed. Starting with the first episode ‘the 11th hour’, which was a nice idea but was, in my opinion, poorly executed, which was an all too common occurrence in seasons 5 and 6. To my shame, I blamed Smith for the poor quality of the new series.
I think this was because Matt Smith played the Doctor in a very similar way to his very popular predecessor, and as a result comparisons were made and Tennant’s doctor was better in every way. Smith accentuated the crazy and eccentric surface layer provided by the 10th Doctor. David Tennant built on his predecessor Christopher Eccleston’s performance by teaming the bitter (the guy just lost his planet, he had every right to be pissed) 9th Doctor with his own eccentricity, providing a very Funny Doctor on the Surface while maintaining deep emotions, providing audiences with a very likeable and relatable character. Smith failed to carry out any real character development. Instead he focused on accentuating the barmy surface. To me the 11th doctor didn’t have any depth of emotion and as a result didn’t become at all likeable until the loss of Amy and Rory. Only at this point did Smith develop his incarnation of the Doctor’s emotions. It was only then did I begin to enjoy watching Doctor Who again. It wasn’t until the end of series 5 that I saw the real issue with the new Doctor’s tenure.
Following the departure of Davis, the quality of the writing seemed to take a real nose dive. The group of writers providing the story lines hadn’t changed much, so who was to blame? Steven Moffat, that’s who. It almost seemed that Moffat was too lazy to properly edit the scripts, allowing dull and stodgy lines to seep into every episode.
In the rare case there was a decent story, my mind immediately jumps to the one with the Daleks in World War II London, it was ruined by some pretty woeful casting epitomised by Karen Gillan. I can’t even say or type her name without scowling. The Scot was dreadful and I really do mean dreadful, failing in almost every case to say a line of dialogue without sounding like she should really be presenting the lottery. In all honesty, the obnoxious Colin Baker (the 6th doctor) and his screaming companion Peri, portrayed by Nicola Bryant, are more likable than Karen Gillan’s Amy Pond.
Moffat had an unhealthy obsession with River Song, a character of his own creation, and I was desperate for him to let her death in the Silent Library stick. However the new head writer decided he would drag the character into every possible story. Giving her a really dreadful link to the companions of the time and her own catch phrase. Kingston’s delivery of dialogue was almost as bad as her on screen mother’s (Gillan again). The character became more of an irritant than anything else. Also, the whole conceived on the TARDIS meaning she gained Time Lord traits is, for want of a better word, absolute Bollocks.
However by the end of Smith’s time as The Doctor, the irritating characters had finally departed, either through death or by the touch of a Weeping Angel. The writing team seemed to have settled into their new roles, producing some good story lines. Which were portrayed well by the competent pairing of Smith and his new on screen assistant, Clara (Jenna Coleman). I do still have one remaining bugbear with the ‘New Who’ (I hope you can still read the sarcasm). It’s that the companions, assistants or whatever you want to call them, are always given a back story that is followed throughout their time on the show. I can list them if you want;
Rose – Bad Wolf
Donna – Doctor Donna
Amy – The Girl Who Waited
Rory – the Last Centurion
River Song – The Doctors Wife/ Killing the Doctor etc.
Clara – That Whole recurring cycle of death thing
When these back stories work, like ‘Bad wolf’ and ‘Doctor Donna’, they are brilliant and worth having in the show to add something extra that links the episodes together. This is also down to the T. Davis factor and his undoubted ability to create a story. However the recurring stories under Moffat have been odd and confusing in most cases. In Rory’s case it seems to be put in just to actually get him involved, as throughout the previous episodes of season 5 he may as well not be there. I think this underlines Moffat’s skills and short comings. He can write a brilliant one off story, ‘Blink’ being a prime example, but as a head writer I don’t think he is up to scratch. The back story isn’t needed to make a good series. Looking back to the original Doctors Whos there is only one recurring story, which is during the 6th Doctors tenure ‘The Trail of a Time Lord’, and the less said about Colin Baker’s irritating incarnation the better.
My Favourite Doctors are Tom Baker and Sylvester McCoy. I do like a dark Doctor. One of the reasons I like the original episodes… Wait, before I continue, here is a bit of a tangent rant for you:
Not ‘Classic Who’… This is another thing I really dislike about modern TV. These irritating groups of people who call themselves ‘fan girls/guys’. Get a life you sad people. I am talking about the kind of people who spend hours poring over Tumblr laughing at gif files from Doctor Who episodes and will go out and ‘cosplay’. Why can’t they just watch it because they want to? Why do they have to shout out to the world that they are a fan? These are the people that have coined the terms ‘Classic’ and ‘New Who’, and that is why I dislike them and their ‘Fandom ways’.
Anyway back to the original point. I like the original Doctor Who episodes because the Doctor is a more Distant Darker Character. None of this Kissing malarkey which Paul McGann did in the Doctor Who film. I didn’t think the steampunk Doctor Who effort was half bad. It was a bit stupid, but I would have liked to have seen it continued in a series as was planned. I am very excited about the upcoming series, no matter what you may think. In a recent BBC interview Peter Capaldi described his 12th Doctor as not being ‘User Friendly’. Music to my cynical ears. I hope that Capaldi takes elements of the darker, more distant older Doctors while still making the character his own and up to date to ensure that the program grows in popularity.